+760.2%
PLTR vs GH
+613.7%
+146.5%
-48.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | GH | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +5.5% | +5.2% | +0.2% | +4.3% |
| 7D | -5.1% | -7.0% | +1.9% | -3.5% |
| 30D | -19.1% | -5.2% | -13.9% | -18.0% |
| 3M | -1.6% | -5.8% | +4.1% | -0.7% |
| 6M | +22.8% | +65.9% | -43.1% | +8.9% |
| YTD | -4.8% | +55.5% | -60.3% | -14.7% |
| 1Y | -4.9% | +64.2% | -69.1% | -15.8% |
| All | +760.2% | +613.7% | +146.5% | +443.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GH.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GH return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GH return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GH wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling