+561.2%
PLTR vs FLNC
-69.8%
+631.0%
-77.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | FLNC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.5% | -8.3% | +7.9% | +1.3% |
| 7D | 0.0% | -4.2% | +4.2% | +0.7% |
| 30D | -3.3% | -20.0% | +16.7% | +1.0% |
| 3M | +28.4% | -56.9% | +85.2% | +50.4% |
| 6M | +8.4% | -35.5% | +43.9% | +8.5% |
| YTD | -4.6% | -48.8% | +44.2% | -2.6% |
| 1Y | +4.4% | +49.3% | -44.8% | -24.3% |
| 3Y | +1,020.5% | -61.8% | +1,082.3% | +857.9% |
| All | +561.2% | -69.8% | +631.0% | +381.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FLNC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FLNC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FLNC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FLNC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling