+973.7%
PLTR vs FERG
+52.4%
+921.3%
-48.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | FERG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.5% | -1.4% | +0.9% | +0.2% |
| 7D | 0.0% | +0.9% | -0.9% | -0.4% |
| 30D | -3.3% | -15.1% | +11.8% | +4.1% |
| 3M | +28.4% | -4.8% | +33.2% | +31.1% |
| 6M | +8.4% | -2.5% | +10.8% | +8.2% |
| YTD | -4.6% | +1.8% | -6.4% | -7.9% |
| 1Y | +4.4% | -0.3% | +4.7% | +1.7% |
| All | +973.7% | +52.4% | +921.3% | +523.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FERG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FERG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FERG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FERG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling