+1,046.2%
PLTR vs EPAM
-54.6%
+1,100.7%
-48.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | EPAM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -4.5% | -2.4% | -2.1% | -3.6% |
| 7D | -6.4% | +2.0% | -8.4% | -7.1% |
| 30D | +10.0% | +6.5% | +3.5% | +6.8% |
| 3M | +23.0% | +19.9% | +3.1% | +13.6% |
| 6M | +13.8% | -16.9% | +30.7% | +20.1% |
| YTD | -1.9% | -42.9% | +40.9% | +16.7% |
| 1Y | +11.6% | -30.4% | +42.0% | +22.0% |
| All | +1,046.2% | -54.6% | +1,100.7% | +1,180.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EPAM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EPAM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EPAM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EPAM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling