+774.7%
PLTR vs ENTG
+64.3%
+710.4%
-48.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ENTG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.1% | +11.3% | -9.2% | -1.4% |
| 7D | +0.4% | +7.9% | -7.5% | -2.1% |
| 30D | -17.5% | -3.6% | -14.0% | -17.1% |
| 3M | -1.5% | +2.7% | -4.2% | -3.8% |
| 6M | +25.9% | +3.6% | +22.4% | +17.9% |
| YTD | -3.0% | +83.6% | -86.6% | -31.1% |
| 1Y | -9.7% | +84.9% | -94.6% | -36.3% |
| All | +774.7% | +64.3% | +710.4% | +454.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ENTG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ENTG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ENTG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ENTG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling