+1,046.2%
PLTR vs EAT
+657.6%
+388.6%
-48.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | EAT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -4.5% | +0.6% | -5.1% | -4.6% |
| 7D | -6.4% | 0.0% | -6.4% | -6.5% |
| 30D | +10.0% | +1.9% | +8.2% | +9.1% |
| 3M | +23.0% | +68.7% | -45.6% | +6.6% |
| 6M | +13.8% | +66.9% | -53.1% | -2.5% |
| YTD | -1.9% | +60.4% | -62.3% | -15.3% |
| 1Y | +11.6% | +44.0% | -32.3% | -0.7% |
| All | +1,046.2% | +657.6% | +388.6% | +486.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EAT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EAT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EAT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EAT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling