+26.0%
PLTR vs CHYM
-24.9%
+50.8%
-48.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | CHYM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.3% | -4.3% | +2.0% | -1.3% |
| 7D | -5.3% | +2.1% | -7.4% | -5.9% |
| 30D | -1.0% | +11.0% | -12.0% | -3.5% |
| 3M | +24.8% | +83.9% | -59.1% | +5.2% |
| 6M | +8.4% | +45.3% | -37.0% | -4.1% |
| YTD | -4.2% | +28.4% | -32.6% | -14.1% |
| 1Y | +9.1% | +32.2% | -23.1% | -4.9% |
| All | +26.0% | -24.9% | +50.8% | +16.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside CHYM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus CHYM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × CHYM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded CHYM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling