+736.0%
PLTR vs ASML
+118.1%
+617.9%
-48.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ASML | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -9.7% | -9.3% | -0.4% | -6.2% |
| 7D | -21.1% | -19.0% | -2.1% | -14.6% |
| 30D | -19.3% | -25.9% | +6.6% | -9.9% |
| 3M | -2.2% | -19.1% | +16.9% | +5.1% |
| 6M | +14.0% | -5.7% | +19.8% | +11.6% |
| YTD | -12.8% | +27.6% | -40.4% | -28.3% |
| 1Y | -17.5% | +30.8% | -48.3% | -33.0% |
| All | +736.0% | +118.1% | +617.9% | +327.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ASML.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ASML return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ASML return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ASML wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling