+1,046.2%
PLTR vs ASML
+164.3%
+881.8%
-48.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ASML | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -4.5% | +4.2% | -8.7% | -6.2% |
| 7D | -6.4% | +1.1% | -7.5% | -7.0% |
| 30D | +10.0% | +2.2% | +7.9% | +8.8% |
| 3M | +23.0% | -2.3% | +25.3% | +21.3% |
| 6M | +13.8% | +23.0% | -9.2% | -1.4% |
| YTD | -1.9% | +61.1% | -63.0% | -27.5% |
| 1Y | +11.6% | +129.1% | -117.5% | -32.4% |
| All | +1,046.2% | +164.3% | +881.8% | +380.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ASML.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ASML return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ASML return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ASML wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling