+626.4%
PLTR vs AMDL
+95.0%
+531.4%
-48.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | AMDL | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -4.5% | +9.2% | -13.7% | -6.1% |
| 7D | -6.4% | +4.5% | -11.0% | -7.3% |
| 30D | +10.0% | -4.4% | +14.4% | +10.0% |
| 3M | +23.0% | -30.5% | +53.5% | +24.1% |
| 6M | +13.8% | +300.9% | -287.1% | -26.6% |
| YTD | -1.9% | +219.9% | -221.9% | -35.6% |
| 1Y | +11.6% | +374.7% | -363.1% | -37.5% |
| All | +626.4% | +95.0% | +531.4% | +265.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside AMDL.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus AMDL return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × AMDL return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded AMDL wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling