-27.8%
PLTD vs NIO
-47.2%
+19.4%
-55.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +9.5% | -3.0% | +12.5% | +8.7% |
| 7D | +25.1% | -3.6% | +28.7% | +24.0% |
| 30D | +21.0% | -8.0% | +29.1% | +18.8% |
| 3M | -2.9% | -31.2% | +28.2% | -9.2% |
| 6M | -27.8% | -45.8% | +18.0% | -31.4% |
| All | -27.8% | -47.2% | +19.4% | -31.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling