-77.5%
PLTD vs LH
+45.2%
-122.8%
-80.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | LH | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.6% | -1.4% | +6.0% | +4.1% |
| 7D | +5.9% | -2.5% | +8.4% | +5.0% |
| 30D | -11.6% | +4.3% | -15.9% | -10.2% |
| 3M | -29.9% | +25.5% | -55.5% | -23.8% |
| 6M | -28.5% | +17.0% | -45.5% | -24.3% |
| YTD | -20.4% | +31.3% | -51.7% | -10.7% |
| 1Y | -33.3% | +20.0% | -53.2% | -28.2% |
| All | -77.5% | +45.2% | -122.8% | -68.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LH.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LH return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LH return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LH wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling