-77.7%
PLTD vs DAR
+47.6%
-125.4%
-83.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | DAR | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.4% | +2.2% | -1.8% | +0.9% |
| 7D | -9.8% | +9.2% | -18.9% | -7.7% |
| 30D | +18.9% | -12.3% | +31.2% | +16.0% |
| 3M | -4.2% | -12.7% | +8.5% | -6.6% |
| 6M | -34.8% | -12.8% | -22.1% | -36.1% |
| YTD | -21.1% | +53.8% | -74.9% | -8.1% |
| 1Y | -19.3% | +60.3% | -79.5% | -4.2% |
| All | -77.7% | +47.6% | -125.4% | -72.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside DAR.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus DAR return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × DAR return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded DAR wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling