-66.7%
PLTD vs BIYA
-99.8%
+33.1%
-73.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | BIYA | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.6% | -1.7% | +6.4% | +4.7% |
| 7D | +5.9% | +1.3% | +4.6% | +5.9% |
| 30D | -11.6% | -21.0% | +9.4% | -11.4% |
| 3M | -29.9% | -74.3% | +44.4% | -29.1% |
| 6M | -28.5% | -84.6% | +56.1% | -28.3% |
| YTD | -20.4% | -94.2% | +73.8% | -19.4% |
| 1Y | -33.3% | -98.2% | +65.0% | -32.4% |
| All | -66.7% | -99.8% | +33.1% | -65.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BIYA.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BIYA return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BIYA return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BIYA wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling