-77.5%
PLTD vs ARMK
+41.8%
-119.3%
-80.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | ARMK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.6% | -0.9% | +5.5% | +4.5% |
| 7D | +5.9% | -2.4% | +8.3% | +5.5% |
| 30D | -11.6% | 0.0% | -11.6% | -11.5% |
| 3M | -29.9% | +6.7% | -36.6% | -28.9% |
| 6M | -28.5% | +38.8% | -67.3% | -22.2% |
| YTD | -20.4% | +55.2% | -75.6% | -10.0% |
| 1Y | -33.3% | +46.6% | -79.9% | -26.1% |
| All | -77.5% | +41.8% | -119.3% | -71.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ARMK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ARMK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ARMK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ARMK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling