-77.5%
PLTD vs ACM
-39.7%
-37.8%
-80.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | ACM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.6% | -0.4% | +5.0% | +4.4% |
| 7D | +5.9% | -3.7% | +9.7% | +3.8% |
| 30D | -11.6% | -11.1% | -0.5% | -16.5% |
| 3M | -29.9% | -8.0% | -22.0% | -32.4% |
| 6M | -28.5% | -29.7% | +1.1% | -43.1% |
| YTD | -20.4% | -29.4% | +9.0% | -35.5% |
| 1Y | -33.3% | -46.4% | +13.2% | -58.5% |
| All | -77.5% | -39.7% | -37.8% | -80.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ACM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ACM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ACM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ACM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling