+6.2%
PLD vs ZCMD
-99.9%
+106.1%
-16.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZCMD | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.1% | -4.6% | +3.5% | -1.2% |
| 7D | 0.0% | -2.9% | +2.9% | 0.0% |
| 30D | -3.7% | -28.5% | +24.7% | -3.9% |
| 3M | -7.9% | -56.5% | +48.6% | -8.2% |
| 6M | -9.2% | -99.7% | +90.4% | -4.5% |
| YTD | +3.1% | -99.9% | +102.9% | +9.2% |
| 1Y | +6.2% | -99.9% | +106.1% | +13.6% |
| All | +6.2% | -99.9% | +106.1% | +13.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZCMD.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZCMD return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZCMD return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZCMD wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling