+9.1%
PLD vs UMAC
+214.8%
-205.6%
-30.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 10y.
| Period | Portfolio | UMAC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.3% | -6.6% | +6.3% | -0.2% |
| 7D | +0.8% | -13.9% | +14.7% | +1.0% |
| 30D | +0.5% | -39.6% | +40.0% | +1.3% |
| 3M | -5.5% | -53.6% | +48.1% | -4.4% |
| 6M | -8.3% | -6.2% | -2.1% | -9.3% |
| YTD | +4.3% | -1.2% | +5.5% | +2.4% |
| 1Y | +7.4% | +9.7% | -2.2% | +5.0% |
| All | +9.1% | +214.8% | -205.6% | -1.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMAC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMAC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMAC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 10y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMAC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
10y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling