+22.2%
PLD vs SCHG
+85.5%
-63.3%
-31.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | SCHG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.0% | -0.7% | -1.4% | -1.7% |
| 7D | -0.7% | -0.9% | +0.2% | -0.3% |
| 30D | -2.2% | -2.3% | +0.1% | -1.2% |
| 3M | -7.4% | +4.5% | -11.9% | -9.5% |
| 6M | +1.9% | +13.6% | -11.6% | -4.8% |
| YTD | +7.9% | +7.6% | +0.3% | +3.4% |
| 1Y | +25.1% | +13.0% | +12.0% | +16.4% |
| All | +22.2% | +85.5% | -63.3% | -22.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside SCHG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus SCHG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × SCHG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded SCHG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling