+33.3%
PLD vs NTAP
+135.3%
-102.0%
-31.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NTAP | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.2% | -0.1% | -1.1% | -1.2% |
| 7D | -0.8% | -15.1% | +14.3% | +1.2% |
| 30D | -0.3% | -28.1% | +27.8% | +3.9% |
| 3M | -8.0% | -11.4% | +3.4% | -7.0% |
| 6M | -9.8% | +52.2% | -62.0% | -17.9% |
| YTD | +1.8% | +60.4% | -58.6% | -8.8% |
| 1Y | +5.6% | +51.0% | -45.4% | -4.2% |
| 3Y | +33.3% | +135.6% | -102.3% | +8.0% |
| All | +33.3% | +135.3% | -102.0% | +8.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NTAP.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NTAP return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NTAP return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NTAP wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling