+23.8%
PLD vs NTAP
+149.9%
-126.1%
-31.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NTAP | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.7% | +0.1% | -0.8% | -0.7% |
| 7D | -2.4% | -0.8% | -1.6% | -2.3% |
| 30D | -2.4% | -0.5% | -1.9% | -2.5% |
| 3M | -3.8% | +4.1% | -7.9% | -4.8% |
| 6M | 0.0% | +88.0% | -87.9% | -12.6% |
| YTD | +9.2% | +75.6% | -66.3% | -3.4% |
| 1Y | +25.9% | +58.9% | -33.0% | +13.7% |
| All | +23.8% | +149.9% | -126.1% | -6.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NTAP.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NTAP return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NTAP return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NTAP wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling