+33.3%
PLD vs MTB
+95.2%
-62.0%
-31.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | MTB | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.2% | -0.9% | -0.3% | -0.9% |
| 7D | -0.8% | -1.3% | +0.5% | -0.2% |
| 30D | -0.3% | +0.5% | -0.8% | -0.5% |
| 3M | -8.0% | -12.4% | +4.4% | -3.1% |
| 6M | -9.8% | +1.5% | -11.3% | -10.8% |
| YTD | +1.8% | +10.3% | -8.5% | -3.0% |
| 1Y | +5.6% | +22.2% | -16.6% | -3.7% |
| 3Y | +33.3% | +96.9% | -63.7% | -8.4% |
| All | +33.3% | +95.2% | -62.0% | -8.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside MTB.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus MTB return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × MTB return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded MTB wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling