+38.2%
PLD vs MET
+84.2%
-46.0%
-31.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | MET | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.1% | -1.0% | -0.1% | -0.7% |
| 7D | 0.0% | +2.1% | -2.1% | -0.9% |
| 30D | -3.7% | +1.8% | -5.6% | -4.6% |
| 3M | -7.9% | +6.0% | -13.9% | -10.5% |
| 6M | -9.2% | +31.1% | -40.3% | -20.0% |
| YTD | +3.1% | +32.6% | -29.5% | -10.2% |
| 1Y | +6.2% | +30.5% | -24.3% | -6.8% |
| All | +38.2% | +84.2% | -46.0% | -8.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside MET.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus MET return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × MET return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded MET wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling