+38.2%
PLD vs GH
+598.5%
-560.4%
-31.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | GH | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.1% | +0.1% | -1.2% | -1.1% |
| 7D | 0.0% | +0.9% | -0.9% | -0.1% |
| 30D | -3.7% | -4.5% | +0.7% | -3.4% |
| 3M | -7.9% | -6.2% | -1.7% | -7.6% |
| 6M | -9.2% | +55.0% | -64.2% | -14.7% |
| YTD | +3.1% | +51.6% | -48.6% | -3.6% |
| 1Y | +6.2% | +58.3% | -52.1% | -1.3% |
| All | +38.2% | +598.5% | -560.4% | +2.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GH.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GH return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GH return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GH wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling