+25.9%
PLD vs GFS
+35.0%
-9.1%
-9.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | GFS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.8% | -0.3% | +1.1% | +0.8% |
| 7D | -0.9% | +2.6% | -3.5% | -0.9% |
| 30D | -1.2% | -16.4% | +15.2% | -0.6% |
| 3M | -2.3% | -41.6% | +39.3% | -0.5% |
| 6M | +4.5% | -3.7% | +8.2% | +0.7% |
| YTD | +10.1% | +29.3% | -19.2% | +2.9% |
| 1Y | +25.9% | +37.1% | -11.2% | +16.8% |
| All | +25.9% | +35.0% | -9.1% | +16.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GFS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GFS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GFS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GFS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling