+38.3%
PLD vs ENPH
-66.2%
+104.5%
-31.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ENPH | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.1% | -2.7% | +2.7% | +0.3% |
| 7D | +1.3% | -8.4% | +9.8% | +2.0% |
| 30D | -1.4% | -11.2% | +9.8% | -0.7% |
| 3M | -8.2% | -36.1% | +27.9% | -5.3% |
| 6M | -8.0% | -37.9% | +29.9% | -6.3% |
| YTD | +3.2% | -18.7% | +21.8% | +0.7% |
| 1Y | +7.0% | -9.8% | +16.8% | +3.2% |
| 3Y | +38.3% | -66.8% | +105.1% | +32.0% |
| All | +38.3% | -66.2% | +104.5% | +32.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ENPH.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ENPH return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ENPH return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ENPH wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling