+34.9%
PLD vs CFG
+171.1%
-136.2%
-31.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | CFG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.1% | -3.1% | +1.0% | -0.9% |
| 7D | +0.4% | -2.2% | +2.6% | +1.2% |
| 30D | -0.1% | +0.4% | -0.5% | -0.3% |
| 3M | -7.9% | -12.6% | +4.6% | -3.3% |
| 6M | -7.0% | +0.6% | -7.6% | -7.6% |
| YTD | +3.1% | +12.4% | -9.4% | -2.5% |
| 1Y | +7.1% | +27.7% | -20.6% | -3.8% |
| All | +34.9% | +171.1% | -136.2% | -18.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside CFG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus CFG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × CFG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded CFG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling