+33.3%
PLD vs AMC
-71.5%
+104.7%
-31.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | AMC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.2% | +1.9% | -3.2% | -1.3% |
| 7D | -0.8% | +2.6% | -3.4% | -0.9% |
| 30D | -0.3% | +9.0% | -9.3% | -0.5% |
| 3M | -8.0% | +22.2% | -30.2% | -8.5% |
| 6M | -9.8% | +91.5% | -101.3% | -11.9% |
| YTD | +1.8% | +101.3% | -99.5% | -1.1% |
| 1Y | +5.6% | +20.8% | -15.2% | +4.2% |
| 3Y | +33.3% | -71.3% | +104.6% | +56.5% |
| All | +33.3% | -71.5% | +104.7% | +56.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside AMC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus AMC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × AMC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded AMC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling