+516.5%
PL vs ZCMD
-100.0%
+616.5%
-77.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZCMD | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.6% | -3.2% | +2.6% | -0.6% |
| 7D | +10.0% | -7.7% | +17.7% | +10.2% |
| 30D | -2.3% | -34.8% | +32.5% | -1.7% |
| 3M | -44.2% | -56.3% | +12.1% | -43.7% |
| 6M | -66.1% | -99.7% | +33.6% | -65.0% |
| YTD | -30.0% | -99.9% | +69.9% | -27.4% |
| 1Y | +21.0% | -99.9% | +120.9% | +26.0% |
| 3Y | +516.5% | -100.0% | +616.5% | +541.8% |
| All | +516.5% | -100.0% | +616.5% | +541.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZCMD.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZCMD return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZCMD return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZCMD wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling