+449.1%
PL vs NIO
-64.6%
+513.7%
-64.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.3% | -1.6% | +0.3% | -0.8% |
| 7D | -9.3% | -13.0% | +3.7% | -5.8% |
| 30D | -18.9% | -18.3% | -0.6% | -14.4% |
| 3M | -58.4% | -33.2% | -25.2% | -53.2% |
| 6M | -30.3% | -21.5% | -8.8% | -26.0% |
| YTD | -8.1% | -25.5% | +17.4% | -1.5% |
| 1Y | +180.5% | -38.0% | +218.5% | +214.6% |
| All | +449.1% | -64.6% | +513.7% | +564.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling