+82.3%
PL vs EPAM
-81.9%
+164.2%
-85.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | EPAM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.3% | -2.4% | +1.1% | -0.6% |
| 7D | -9.3% | +2.0% | -11.3% | -9.8% |
| 30D | -18.9% | +6.5% | -25.5% | -20.9% |
| 3M | -58.4% | +19.9% | -78.3% | -61.1% |
| 6M | -30.3% | -16.9% | -13.4% | -27.9% |
| YTD | -8.1% | -42.9% | +34.8% | +4.8% |
| 1Y | +180.5% | -30.4% | +210.9% | +198.2% |
| 3Y | +444.1% | -54.7% | +498.9% | +543.6% |
| All | +82.3% | -81.9% | +164.2% | +169.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EPAM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EPAM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EPAM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EPAM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling