+142.5%
PH vs FDS
-27.1%
+169.6%
-26.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | FDS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.2% | -3.5% | +3.3% | 0.0% |
| 7D | -3.1% | -1.9% | -1.2% | -2.9% |
| 30D | -3.2% | +9.0% | -12.3% | -3.9% |
| 3M | +10.6% | +18.9% | -8.3% | +9.2% |
| 6M | -2.1% | +35.1% | -37.3% | -5.8% |
| YTD | +10.2% | +5.5% | +4.7% | +13.9% |
| 1Y | +28.2% | -16.8% | +45.0% | +46.7% |
| All | +142.5% | -27.1% | +169.6% | +187.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FDS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FDS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FDS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FDS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling