+82.3%
PFGC vs COO
-24.0%
+106.3%
-25.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | COO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.1% | +0.7% | +0.4% | +0.9% |
| 7D | +3.4% | +0.5% | +2.9% | +3.3% |
| 30D | +16.9% | +14.2% | +2.8% | +13.6% |
| 3M | +6.4% | -18.2% | +24.6% | +10.9% |
| 6M | +16.0% | +5.3% | +10.7% | +13.9% |
| YTD | +23.6% | -23.6% | +47.2% | +30.1% |
| 1Y | +16.6% | -12.7% | +29.3% | +19.0% |
| 3Y | +82.3% | -24.2% | +106.5% | +89.1% |
| All | +82.3% | -24.0% | +106.3% | +89.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside COO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus COO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × COO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded COO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling