+89.0%
PFG vs ACM
+1.1%
+87.9%
-29.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | ACM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.5% | +0.6% | 0.0% | +0.3% |
| 7D | +2.4% | +5.6% | -3.3% | -0.1% |
| 30D | +5.9% | +20.8% | -15.0% | -2.6% |
| 3M | -0.4% | +11.4% | -11.9% | -5.6% |
| 6M | +14.8% | +0.9% | +13.9% | +12.5% |
| YTD | +31.9% | -24.8% | +56.7% | +48.4% |
| 1Y | +38.8% | -46.4% | +85.2% | +88.7% |
| 3Y | +82.4% | -9.2% | +91.6% | +71.5% |
| All | +89.0% | +1.1% | +87.9% | +60.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ACM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ACM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ACM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ACM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling