+69.8%
PFG vs ABCL
+104.5%
-34.7%
-22.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ABCL | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.5% | -1.2% | -0.3% | -1.5% |
| 7D | +5.5% | +0.7% | +4.8% | +5.5% |
| 30D | +2.4% | +93.1% | -90.7% | -3.1% |
| 3M | +13.6% | +79.4% | -65.9% | +7.6% |
| 6M | +27.9% | +214.9% | -187.0% | +14.6% |
| YTD | +35.6% | +234.2% | -198.7% | +20.2% |
| 1Y | +48.5% | +174.8% | -126.3% | +32.7% |
| All | +69.8% | +104.5% | -34.7% | +41.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ABCL.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ABCL return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ABCL return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ABCL wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling