-4.6%
PEP vs ZETA
+254.2%
-258.8%
-27.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZETA | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.2% | -7.3% | +7.5% | +0.2% |
| 7D | +6.7% | -10.0% | +16.7% | +6.6% |
| 30D | +13.5% | -10.6% | +24.1% | +13.4% |
| 3M | +3.9% | +8.9% | -4.9% | +3.9% |
| 6M | -6.0% | +65.1% | -71.1% | -6.0% |
| YTD | +2.5% | +44.8% | -42.4% | +2.5% |
| 1Y | +3.9% | +47.8% | -43.9% | +3.9% |
| All | -4.6% | +254.2% | -258.8% | -11.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZETA.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZETA return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZETA return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZETA wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling