+64.9%
PEP vs GLDM
+248.1%
-183.2%
-30.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | GLDM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.7% | -0.9% | +0.2% | -0.6% |
| 7D | -1.4% | -0.5% | -0.9% | -1.4% |
| 30D | +0.2% | +4.4% | -4.2% | -0.2% |
| 3M | -1.1% | -1.1% | -0.1% | -1.0% |
| 6M | -13.5% | -13.7% | +0.2% | -12.3% |
| YTD | -1.2% | +2.8% | -3.9% | -2.0% |
| 1Y | -1.6% | +24.8% | -26.4% | -4.7% |
| 3Y | -12.5% | +127.8% | -140.3% | -23.8% |
| 5Y | +3.0% | +141.1% | -138.1% | -12.0% |
| All | +64.9% | +248.1% | -183.2% | +38.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GLDM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GLDM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GLDM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GLDM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling