+169.6%
PENG vs EPAM
-16.7%
+186.3%
-46.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | EPAM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +6.4% | -2.4% | +8.8% | +4.8% |
| 7D | +4.5% | +2.0% | +2.6% | +6.0% |
| 30D | -7.1% | +6.5% | -13.6% | -2.3% |
| 3M | -27.3% | +19.9% | -47.2% | -4.0% |
| 6M | +169.6% | -16.9% | +186.5% | +276.2% |
| All | +169.6% | -16.7% | +186.3% | +276.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EPAM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EPAM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EPAM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EPAM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling