+103.5%
PENG vs ABCL
+104.5%
-0.9%
-50.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ABCL | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +6.4% | -1.2% | +7.6% | +6.6% |
| 7D | +4.5% | +0.7% | +3.8% | +4.4% |
| 30D | -7.1% | +93.1% | -100.2% | -19.4% |
| 3M | -27.3% | +79.4% | -106.7% | -36.6% |
| 6M | +169.6% | +214.9% | -45.3% | +108.5% |
| YTD | +164.6% | +234.2% | -69.6% | +99.7% |
| 1Y | +109.5% | +174.8% | -65.3% | +61.4% |
| All | +103.5% | +104.5% | -0.9% | +75.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ABCL.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ABCL return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ABCL return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ABCL wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling