+34.5%
PEG vs MTB
+105.0%
-70.5%
-24.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | MTB | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.7% | -0.2% | +0.9% | +0.7% |
| 7D | +2.3% | 0.0% | +2.3% | +2.3% |
| 30D | +6.1% | +0.8% | +5.3% | +6.0% |
| 3M | -0.5% | -12.8% | +12.2% | +2.0% |
| 6M | -3.2% | +6.7% | -9.9% | -4.4% |
| YTD | -4.4% | +11.3% | -15.7% | -6.8% |
| 1Y | -7.4% | +20.2% | -27.5% | -11.1% |
| All | +34.5% | +105.0% | -70.5% | +13.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside MTB.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus MTB return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × MTB return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded MTB wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling