-18.7%
PDD vs NIO
-64.6%
+45.9%
-53.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.7% | -1.6% | +2.3% | +1.1% |
| 7D | -4.1% | -13.0% | +9.0% | -0.8% |
| 30D | -9.6% | -18.3% | +8.7% | -5.2% |
| 3M | -4.3% | -33.2% | +28.9% | +5.1% |
| 6M | -18.8% | -21.5% | +2.7% | -15.3% |
| YTD | -27.5% | -25.5% | -2.0% | -23.7% |
| 1Y | -33.6% | -38.0% | +4.4% | -27.6% |
| All | -18.7% | -64.6% | +45.9% | -10.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling