-21.6%
PDD vs NIO
-62.1%
+40.5%
-53.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.2% | -3.0% | +5.2% | +2.9% |
| 7D | +5.9% | -3.6% | +9.5% | +6.8% |
| 30D | +7.1% | -8.0% | +15.1% | +9.2% |
| 3M | -7.7% | -31.2% | +23.5% | +0.8% |
| 6M | -13.2% | -45.8% | +32.5% | -0.2% |
| YTD | -26.0% | -37.3% | +11.3% | -18.8% |
| 1Y | -38.4% | -56.1% | +17.7% | -26.4% |
| All | -21.6% | -62.1% | +40.5% | -14.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling