-19.5%
PCG vs ZETA
+55.9%
-75.5%
-37.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZETA | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.0% | +5.3% | -7.3% | -1.7% |
| 7D | -1.6% | -0.4% | -1.1% | -1.6% |
| 30D | +1.4% | -8.0% | +9.4% | +1.1% |
| 3M | -23.4% | +21.4% | -44.8% | -22.5% |
| 6M | -19.4% | +80.1% | -99.5% | -16.6% |
| YTD | -18.5% | +52.5% | -71.0% | -15.6% |
| 1Y | -19.5% | +58.5% | -78.0% | -16.4% |
| All | -19.5% | +55.9% | -75.5% | -16.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZETA.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZETA return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZETA return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZETA wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling