-23.8%
PCG vs UMAC
+69.4%
-93.2%
-29.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | UMAC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.4% | -3.1% | +5.5% | +2.4% |
| 7D | -13.9% | -0.9% | -12.9% | -13.8% |
| 30D | -16.9% | -7.7% | -9.2% | -16.8% |
| 3M | -14.7% | -26.4% | +11.7% | -14.3% |
| 6M | -23.8% | +61.9% | -85.7% | -24.4% |
| All | -23.8% | +69.4% | -93.2% | -24.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMAC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMAC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMAC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMAC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling