-16.0%
PCG vs UMAC
+2.9%
-18.9%
-37.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | UMAC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.8% | -10.9% | +11.7% | +0.7% |
| 7D | +1.9% | -26.0% | +28.0% | +1.7% |
| 30D | +8.5% | -40.3% | +48.8% | +8.1% |
| 3M | -22.9% | -51.1% | +28.3% | -23.2% |
| 6M | -16.8% | -5.6% | -11.1% | -15.8% |
| YTD | -15.8% | +2.3% | -18.1% | -13.9% |
| 1Y | -16.0% | +7.9% | -23.9% | -13.9% |
| All | -16.0% | +2.9% | -18.9% | -13.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMAC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMAC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMAC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMAC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling