-23.8%
PCG vs REPL
+107.4%
-131.3%
-29.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | REPL | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.4% | -1.6% | +4.1% | +2.4% |
| 7D | -13.9% | -3.0% | -10.9% | -13.9% |
| 30D | -16.9% | +27.1% | -44.0% | -16.7% |
| 3M | -14.7% | +52.4% | -67.1% | -13.9% |
| 6M | -23.8% | +107.4% | -131.3% | -25.9% |
| All | -23.8% | +107.4% | -131.3% | -25.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside REPL.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus REPL return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × REPL return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded REPL wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling