-11.1%
PCG vs NVT
+193.5%
-204.6%
-39.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NVT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +3.6% | +4.2% | -0.6% | +3.3% |
| 7D | +5.4% | +10.4% | -5.0% | +4.5% |
| 30D | -15.1% | -1.3% | -13.8% | -15.1% |
| 3M | -9.8% | -0.6% | -9.2% | -10.1% |
| 6M | -18.0% | +53.8% | -71.8% | -22.8% |
| YTD | -7.2% | +60.2% | -67.4% | -13.3% |
| 1Y | +2.9% | +76.8% | -73.9% | -5.6% |
| 3Y | -11.1% | +191.2% | -202.3% | -30.1% |
| All | -11.1% | +193.5% | -204.6% | -30.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NVT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NVT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NVT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NVT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling