-18.3%
PCG vs NOC
+24.7%
-43.0%
-43.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NOC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.2% | +0.2% | +1.9% | +2.1% |
| 7D | +2.2% | +4.8% | -2.7% | +1.6% |
| 30D | +0.8% | +11.0% | -10.3% | -0.6% |
| 3M | -23.8% | -3.8% | -20.0% | -23.4% |
| 6M | -19.6% | +0.6% | -20.3% | -19.7% |
| YTD | -16.7% | -2.3% | -14.4% | -16.7% |
| 1Y | -19.4% | +0.3% | -19.6% | -19.6% |
| 3Y | -18.3% | +24.6% | -42.9% | -21.6% |
| All | -18.3% | +24.7% | -43.0% | -21.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NOC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NOC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NOC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NOC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling