-23.8%
PCG vs NCLH
-27.2%
+3.4%
-29.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | NCLH | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.4% | -0.1% | +2.6% | +2.4% |
| 7D | -13.9% | -6.5% | -7.4% | -13.2% |
| 30D | -16.9% | -23.3% | +6.4% | -15.0% |
| 3M | -14.7% | -18.6% | +3.9% | -13.4% |
| 6M | -23.8% | -26.2% | +2.4% | -21.6% |
| All | -23.8% | -27.2% | +3.4% | -21.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NCLH.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NCLH return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NCLH return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NCLH wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling