-19.4%
PCG vs LSCC
+69.3%
-88.7%
-43.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | LSCC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.3% | -8.6% | +7.3% | -0.9% |
| 7D | 0.0% | -4.8% | +4.8% | +0.2% |
| 30D | +5.8% | -27.1% | +32.9% | +7.1% |
| 3M | -22.8% | -23.6% | +0.8% | -22.0% |
| 6M | -18.4% | -19.8% | +1.4% | -18.3% |
| YTD | -16.9% | +33.2% | -50.1% | -19.3% |
| 1Y | -17.6% | +55.2% | -72.9% | -20.8% |
| All | -19.4% | +69.3% | -88.7% | -27.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LSCC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LSCC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LSCC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LSCC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling