-23.8%
PCG vs HTZ
-47.2%
+23.4%
-29.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | HTZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.4% | +1.3% | +1.1% | +2.5% |
| 7D | -13.9% | +7.5% | -21.3% | -13.6% |
| 30D | -16.9% | +47.4% | -64.3% | -16.5% |
| 3M | -14.7% | -54.9% | +40.2% | -14.7% |
| 6M | -23.8% | -47.0% | +23.2% | -24.8% |
| All | -23.8% | -47.2% | +23.4% | -24.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside HTZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus HTZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × HTZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded HTZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling