-19.2%
PCG vs ENB
+70.6%
-89.8%
-43.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ENB | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.0% | +0.3% | -1.3% | -1.2% |
| 7D | -2.2% | -1.8% | -0.5% | -1.3% |
| 30D | -0.5% | +2.0% | -2.5% | -1.6% |
| 3M | -24.0% | -5.8% | -18.1% | -21.5% |
| 6M | -18.6% | -9.7% | -8.9% | -14.0% |
| YTD | -17.7% | +4.2% | -21.9% | -20.1% |
| 1Y | -20.0% | +3.2% | -23.2% | -22.0% |
| All | -19.2% | +70.6% | -89.8% | -38.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ENB.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ENB return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ENB return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ENB wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling