+172.3%
PCAR vs ECHO
+242.1%
-69.8%
-27.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | ECHO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.2% | 0.0% | +0.1% | +0.2% |
| 7D | -0.5% | +3.4% | -3.9% | -0.7% |
| 30D | -6.2% | +2.4% | -8.6% | -6.4% |
| 3M | +5.9% | -28.0% | +33.8% | +7.6% |
| 6M | +0.4% | -21.2% | +21.6% | +1.4% |
| YTD | +14.8% | -17.4% | +32.2% | +15.5% |
| 1Y | +30.1% | +33.6% | -3.5% | +27.3% |
| 3Y | +66.7% | +419.7% | -353.0% | +41.8% |
| All | +172.3% | +242.1% | -69.8% | +144.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ECHO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ECHO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ECHO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ECHO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling